Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 06:55

Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
SpaceX adds 26 satellites to its Starlink constellation with launch from California - Space
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
‘Resident Evil Requiem’ Sets February 2026 Release From Capcom - Variety
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Decker manhunt: Officials reopen Icicle River area - KING5.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sit non et voluptatem consequatur possimus corporis omnis eaque.
What’s next?
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
How much does a doctor earn in Sweden per month?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
GOP megabill could undermine US energy production, Republicans warn - Politico
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Hell Is Us' Intriguingly Bold Design Decisions Refuse To Give You A Hint - GameSpot